C–G Languages Engagement Snapshot
Student Voice Evidence · French & Spanish · End-of-Year Rotation · Focus: what students value, where engagement holds, and what to refine through shorter engagement pulses next year.
Executive Snapshot
Transition baseline context → End C–G profile
| Metric | Transition Baseline | End C–G | Context Shift |
|---|---|---|---|
| Motivation / Value | 93% | 79% | -14 |
| Belonging / Safety | 95% | 88% | -7 |
| Participation / Effort | 90% | 88% | -2 |
| Attention / Comfort | 95% | 86% | -9 |
Reading note: this is a practical student voice snapshot, not a controlled matched-cohort study. Use the shifts as context signals and use the end snapshot as the main current engagement profile.
End C–G Class Profiles
Submitted end-window evidence only
Dominant Themes — with Polarity
Open-response patterns
Driver counts come from “what makes learning easier” and improvement comments. Top theme is scaled to 100.
Requests come from “what would make class more enjoyable / richer.” Games and collaborative projects dominate.
Pain points are not failure labels. They identify where lesson design can reduce friction and increase access.
Student Voice Samples
Representative, anonymized evidence
Engagement Interpretation
What this means for C–G planning
Method note: Available survey evidence: 77 end-of-C–G responses and 23 transition-baseline responses. Duplicate exports were de-duplicated. Missing survey windows and malformed/non-response cells were excluded rather than scored negatively.